By Dr. Sushama R. Chaphalkar, PhD.May 22 2024Reviewed by Susha Cheriyedath, M.Sc. In a recent study published in the International Journal for Educational Integrity, researchers in China compared, for the first time, the accuracy of artificial intelligence -based content detectors and human reviewers in detecting AI-generated rehabilitation-related articles, both original and paraphrased. They found that among the given tools, Originality.
About the study In the present study, 50 peer-reviewed papers related to rehabilitation were chosen from high-impact journals. Artificial research papers were then created using specific prompts in ChatGPT version 3.5 . The resulting articles were rephrased using Wordtune to improve their authenticity. Further, six AI-based content detectors were used to differentiate between original, ChatGPT-generated, and AI-rephrased papers. The included tools were either free to use or paid .
A The frequency of the primary reason for artificial intelligence -rephrased articles being identified by each reviewer. B The relative frequency of each reason for AI-rephrased articles being identified